Improvement of muscle strength and fatigue with high voltage pulsed galvanic stimulation in multiple sclerosis patients - a non-randomized controlled trial

Autor: Çetişli Korkmaz, Nilüfer, Kirdi, N., Temucin, C.M., Armutlu, K., Yakut, Y., Karabudak, R.
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2011
Předmět:
Adult
Male
electromyography
neuromuscular facilitation
Multiple Sclerosis
Ankle/physiology
Case-Control Studies
Electric Stimulation/*methods
Electromyography
Female
Humans
Knee/physiology
Middle Aged
Multiple Sclerosis/complications/physiopathology/*therapy
Muscle Contraction/physiology
Muscle Fatigue/*physiology
Muscle Spasticity/rehabilitation/*therapy
Muscle Strength
Muscle Stretching Exercises
Prospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
dynamometry
muscle contraction
controlled study
Knee
human
intermethod comparison
muscle weakness
flexor muscle
clinical article
controlled clinical trial
High voltage pulsed galvanic stimulation (HVPGS)
electrostimulation therapy
article
spasticity
therapy effect
Multiple sclerosis (MS)
Electric Stimulation
female
leg muscle
Muscle Spasticity
Muscle Fatigue
fatigue
Strength
high voltage pulsed galvanic stimulation
Ankle
prospective study
Popis: OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of High Voltage Pulsed Galvanic Stimulation (HVPGS), that was applied to the spasticity associated weakness in knee flexors and ankle dorsiflexors, on strength and fatigue, in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients, in a non-randomized controlled trial. METHODS: A total of 33 MS patients were included. Fatigue and strength were analyzed with 3rd and 30th second data by dynamometric measurements synchronously with surface electromyography (EMG) [power spectrum analysis (amplitude, mean frequency, median frequency and root means square]. In the experimental group HVPGS and in the control group repetitive contractions from Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) technique were applied for 18 treatment sessions. RESULTS: In both groups and all muscle groups, dynamometric measurement and EMG results in the 30th second were significantly lower according to in the 3rd second before and after the treatments. Both strength and fatigue improved after the treatment both in the HVPGS and PNF group. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that, MS patients have both central and peripheral fatigue. FO2 localized and intensive effects in strength and fatigue, HVPGS was more impressive than the PNF. PNF was more effective to obtain general effects. Moreover, the application of HVPGS with other rehabilitation techniques may be more appropriate and effective.
Databáze: OpenAIRE