LIBERDADE DE EXPRESSÃO E DISCURSO DO ÓDIO NO BRASIL / FREE SPEECH AND HATE SPEECH IN BRAZIL
| Autor: | Nevita Maria Pessoa de Aquino Franca Luna, Gustavo Santos |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | portugalština |
| Rok vydání: | 2014 |
| Předmět: |
Liberdade positiva
Direito das minorias Minoria Direitos e garantias individuais Direitos coletivos Liberdade de expressão direito comparado Direitos do homem Garantias dos direitos individuais Freedom of expression Direitos humanos (Direito Constitucional) lcsh:Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence Homossexualidade discriminação Comparative Law Hate speech Discriminação à homossexualidade Homossexual discriminação Minorities Direitos dos cidadão lcsh:Jurisprudence. Philosophy and theory of law Proteção da dignidade da pessoa humana Discriminação por orientação sexual Homofobia lcsh:Law Princípio da dignidade da pessoa humana Liberdade de pensamento Liberdade negativa Direitos fundamentais Garantias constitucionais Discriminação a homossexuais Direitos civis lcsh:K1-7720 Preconceito Liberdade de consciência lcsh:K201-487 Direitos humanos Prejudice lcsh:K |
| Zdroj: | Revista Direito e Liberdade, Vol 16, Iss 3, Pp 227-255 (2014) Repositório Institucional do STJ Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) instacron:STJ BASE-Bielefeld Academic Search Engine |
| ISSN: | 2177-1758 1809-3280 |
| Popis: | The purpose of this article is to analyze the restriction of free speech when it comes close to hate speech. In this perspective, the aim of this study is to answer the question: what is the understanding adopted by the Brazilian Supreme Court in cases involving the conflict between free speech and hate speech? The methodology combines a bibliographic review on the theoretical assumptions of the research (concept of free speech and hate speech, and understanding of the rights of defense of traditionally discriminated minorities) and empirical research (documental and jurisprudential analysis of judged cases of American Court, German Court and Brazilian Court). Firstly, free speech is discussed, defining its meaning, content and purpose. Then, the hate speech is pointed as an inhibitor element of free speech for offending members of traditionally discriminated minorities, who are outnumbered or in a situation of cultural, socioeconomic or political subordination. Subsequently, are discussed some aspects of American (negative freedom) and German models (positive freedom), to demonstrate that different cultures adopt different legal solutions. At the end, it is concluded that there is an approximation of the Brazilian understanding with the German doctrine, from the analysis of landmark cases as the publisher Siegfried Ellwanger (2003) and the Samba School Unidos do Viradouro (2008). The Brazilian comprehension, a multicultural country made up of different ethnicities, leads to a new process of defending minorities who, despite of involving the collision of fundamental rights (dignity, equality and freedom), is still restrained by incompatible barriers of a contemporary pluralistic democracy. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|