Pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass: a need for a reference standard
Autor: | Buckinx, F., Landi, F., Cesari, M., Fielding, R.A., Visser, M., Engelke, K., Maggi, S., Dennison, E., Al-Daghri, N.M., Allepaerts, S., Bauer, J., Bautmans, I., Brandi, M.L., Bruyere, O., Cederholm, T., Cerreta, F., Cherubini, A., Cooper, C., Cruz-Jentoft, A., McCloskey, E., Dawson-Hughes, B., Kaufman, J.-M., Laslop, A., Petermans, J., Reginster, J.-Y., Rizzoli, R., Robinson, S., Rolland, Y., Rueda, R., Vellas, B., Kanis, J.A. |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Internal medicine, APH - Aging & Later Life, APH - Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases, AGEM - Endocrinology, metabolism and nutrition, Nutrition and Health, Gerontology, Frailty in Ageing, Research in Geriatrics and Gerontology, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Sarcopenia
BODY-COMPOSITION lcsh:Diseases of the musculoskeletal system CELL LUNG-CANCER Lean body mass Lean mass Muscle mass Reference standard Biophysics Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Physiology (medical) lcsh:QM1-695 ELECTRICAL-IMPEDANCE MYOGRAPHY Bone Density Medicine and Health Sciences Humans SEROLOGICAL BIOMARKERS ddc:616 Settore MED/09 - MEDICINA INTERNA IN-VIVO PRECISION X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY lcsh:Human anatomy Reference Standards BIOIMPEDANCE ANALYSIS BIOELECTRICAL-IMPEDANCE SKELETAL-MUSCLE lcsh:RC925-935 PHYSICAL-DISABILITY |
Zdroj: | Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, Vol 9, Iss 2, Pp 269-278 (2018) JOURNAL OF CACHEXIA SARCOPENIA AND MUSCLE Repositorio Institucional de la Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, Vol. 9, No 2 (2018) pp. 269-278 Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 9(2), 269-278. Wiley-Blackwell Buckinx, F, Landi, F, Cesari, M, Fielding, R A, Visser, M, Engelke, K, Maggi, S, Dennison, E, Al-Daghri, N M, Allepaerts, S, Bauer, J, Bautmans, I, Brandi, M L, Bruyère, O, Cederholm, T, Cerreta, F, Cherubini, A, Cooper, C, Cruz-Jentoft, A, McCloskey, E, Dawson-Hughes, B, Kaufman, J M, Laslop, A, Petermans, J, Reginster, J Y, Rizzoli, R, Robinson, S, Rolland, Y, Rueda, R, Vellas, B & Kanis, J A 2018, ' Pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass : a need for a reference standard ', Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 269-278 . https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12268 Buckinx, F, Landi, F, Cesari, M, Fielding, R A, Visser, M, Engelke, K, Maggi, S, Dennison, E, Al-Daghri, N M, Allepaerts, S, Bauer, J, Bautmans, I, Brandi, M L, Bruyère, O, Cederholm, T, Cerreta, F, Cherubini, A, Cooper, C, Cruz-Jentoft, A, McCloskey, E, Dawson-Hughes, B, Kaufman, J-M, Laslop, A, Petermans, J, Reginster, J-Y, Rizzoli, R, Robinson, S, Rolland, Y, Rueda, R, Vellas, B & Kanis, J A 2018, ' Pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass : a need for a reference standard ', Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 269-278 . https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12268 Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 9(2), 269-278. Springer Verlag |
ISSN: | 2190-5991 2190-6009 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jcsm.12268 |
Popis: | Background\ud All proposed definitions of sarcopenia include the measurement of muscle mass, but the techniques and threshold values used vary. Indeed, the literature does not establish consensus on the best technique for measuring lean body mass. Thus, the objective measurement of sarcopenia is hampered by limitations intrinsic to assessment tools. The aim of this study was to review the methods to assess muscle mass and to reach consensus on the development of a reference standard.\ud \ud Methods\ud Literature reviews were performed by members of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis working group on frailty and sarcopenia. Face‐to‐face meetings were organized for the whole group to make amendments and discuss further recommendations.\ud \ud Results\ud A wide range of techniques can be used to assess muscle mass. Cost, availability, and ease of use can determine whether the techniques are better suited to clinical practice or are more useful for research. No one technique subserves all requirements but dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry could be considered as a reference standard (but not a gold standard) for measuring muscle lean body mass.\ud \ud Conclusions\ud Based on the feasibility, accuracy, safety, and low cost, dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry can be considered as the reference standard for measuring muscle mass. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |