Alternative sugar substitutes in canned cherries with improved nutritional value suitable for special diet consumers
Autor: | Maldonado, Mariela Beatriz, Fonzar, Mauricio, Carparelli, Andrea, Polenta, Gustavo Alberto, Vaudagna, Sergio Ramon, Denoya, Gabriela Inés, Bauzá, Marta Mónica, Videla, Adriana Ines, Sanow, Claudio, Robles, María Noelia |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2014 |
Předmět: |
Frutas en Conserva
Canned Fruits Otras Biotecnología Agropecuaria Canned cherries Biotecnología Agropecuaria purl.org/becyt/ford/4.4 [https] Sweeteners CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS Cereza Low Calorie Foods Polyols Edulcorantes Reduced caloric value products Sustitutos de Azúcar Cherries purl.org/becyt/ford/4 [https] Alimentos Bajos Calorías Reduced sugar foods |
Zdroj: | International Journal of Biotechnology and Food Science 2 (7) : 126-142 (November 2014) INTA Digital (INTA) Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria instacron:INTA CONICET Digital (CONICET) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas instacron:CONICET |
Popis: | Cherries in syrup were developed with an improved nutritional profile, which can be a healthier choice for people with special diets by the partial and total replacement of sucrose with less caloric polyols as alternative. The tests performed on Bing cherries were: Witness: sucrose 100%, T1: sucrose-maltitol: 50-50%, T2: sucrose-erythritol-maltitol: 20-30-50%, T3: maltitol-erythritol-mannitol: 55-30-15%. The candied cherries reached a 55°Brix for all formulations, which were colored with erythrosine and amaranth. Cherries were packaged and sterilized. A similar behavior was observed in all formulations, regarding the evolution of Brix, pH and density of syrups. The sucrose replacement with polyols had a significant effect (α = 0.05) in reducing shear stress and aw in the finished product when sucrose was replaced by polyol formulations tested with respect to the witness with 100% sucrose. Color, showed significant differences (α = 0.05). The T2 formulation reached higher values of lightness, close to red and yellow, being correlated with the results of sensory evaluation. Sensorily, T2 formulation had greater acceptance than the Witness, with 43% preference. According to Art. 535 of Argentine Food Code (1971), the T1 formulation, can be classified as a "low in sugar" food; T2 formulation, as a "reduced caloric value" and "low in sugar" food; while the T3 formulation, as "reduced caloric value" and "no added sugars". Fil: Maldonado, Mariela Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Cuyo Mendoza - San Juan; Argentina Fil: Fonzar, Mauricio. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina Fil: Carparelli, Andrea. Universidad Católica de Cuyo - Sede San Juan; Argentina Fil: Polenta, Gustavo Alberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Vaudagna, Sergio Ramon. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina Fil: Denoya, Gabriela Inés. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina Fil: Bauzá, Marta Mónica. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina Fil: Videla, Adriana Ines. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo; Argentina Fil: Sanow, Claudio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina Fil: Robles, María Noelia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |