Rui López de Segura contra el Brocense*
| Autor: | Juan María Gómez Gómez Juan María Gómez |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2005 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Cuadernos de Filología Clásica. Estudios Latinos; Vol. 25 Núm. 1 (2005); 141-155 Cuadernos de Filología Clásica. Estudios Latinos; Vol 25 No 1 (2005); 141-155 Cuadernos de Filología Clásica. Estudios Latinos; V. 25 N. 1 (2005); 141-155 Revistas Científicas Complutenses Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) Cuadernos de Filología Clásica. Estudios Latinos; Vol. 25 No. 1 (2005); 141-155 Juan María Gómez |
| ISSN: | 1988-2343 1131-9062 |
| Popis: | My essay analyses the critique made by the 16th century humanist Rui López de Segura in his gramatical work Grammaticae Institutiones on some of El Brocense´s grammatical ideas such as noun gender or case morphology and so on. In a closer reading of the Brocense´s works, however, that were available to Rui Lopez it can be ascertained that most of his critique has no scientific ground and reveals to a certain degree some personal bias. Besides, some specific data extracted from these invectives lead us into thinking that the Grammaticae Institutiones text that we are currently working with was published later than 1563, date shown on the front cover.My essay analyses the critique made by the 16th century humanist Rui López de Segura in his gramatical work Grammaticae Institutiones on some of El Brocense´s grammatical ideas such as noun gender or case morphology and so on. In a closer reading of the Brocense´s works, however, that were available to Rui Lopez it can be ascertained that most of his critique has no scientific ground and reveals to a certain degree some personal bias. Besides, some specific data extracted from these invectives lead us into thinking that the Grammaticae Institutiones text that we are currently working with was published later than 1563, date shown on the front cover.My essay analyses the critique made by the 16th century humanist Rui López de Segura in his gramatical work Grammaticae Institutiones on some of El Brocense´s grammatical ideas such as noun gender or case morphology and so on. In a closer reading of the Brocense´s works, however, that were available to Rui Lopez it can be ascertained that most of his critique has no scientific ground and reveals to a certain degree some personal bias. Besides, some specific data extracted from these invectives lead us into thinking that the Grammaticae Institutiones text that we are currently working with was published later than 1563, date shown on the front cover.My essay analyses the critique made by the 16th century humanist Rui López de Segura in his gramatical work Grammaticae Institutiones on some of El Brocense´s grammatical ideas such as noun gender or case morphology and so on. In a closer reading of the Brocense´s works, however, that were available to Rui Lopez it can be ascertained that most of his critique has no scientific ground and reveals to a certain degree some personal bias. Besides, some specific data extracted from these invectives lead us into thinking that the Grammaticae Institutiones text that we are currently working with was published later than 1563, date shown on the front cover.My essay analyses the critique made by the 16th century humanist Rui López de Segura in his gramatical work Grammaticae Institutiones on some of El Brocense´s grammatical ideas such as noun gender or case morphology and so on. In a closer reading of the Brocense´s works, however, that were available to Rui Lopez it can be ascertained that most of his critique has no scientific ground and reveals to a certain degree some personal bias. Besides, some specific data extracted from these invectives lead us into thinking that the Grammaticae Institutiones text that we are currently working with was published later than 1563, date shown on the front cover. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|