| Popis: |
Based on her analysis of published tables from US homemakers’ 1924-1932 week-long time-use diaries collected by the US Department of Agriculture, Vanek (1974) concluded that housework time had not declined over the previous half-century—despite the diffusion of many ‘time-saving’ home technologies. Although frequently challenged, this claim still survives in parts of the sociological literature; we use newly available evidence to refute it. Analysis of the original USDA diaries (many of which have now been recovered from the US National Archives) alongside more recent diary microdata from the American Heritage Time Use Study reveals a pair of clear and contrary trends: a continuing decline in women’s core housework (cooking and cleaning) partially offset by an increase of time in childcare and shopping. Names and addresses attached to the original diaries allow the identification of >93% of the USDA diarists in one or both of the 1920 and 1930 US Federal Censuses. Analysis (Oaxaca decomposition) of the household- and individual-level information from this source shows that most of the historical time-shifts result, not from changes in family demography or women’s growing attachment to paid work over this period, but from ‘behavioural’ change, reflecting in part the spread of labour-saving domestic technology. |
