Muscle hypertrophy and strength gains after resistance training with different volume matched loads : a systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor: | Fernandes Carvalho, Leonardo Henrique, 1994, Moriggi Junior, Roberto, 1990, Augusto, Júlia Barreira, 1991, Silva, Renato, 1977 |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS |
Rok vydání: | 2022 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Repositório Institucional da Unicamp Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp |
Popis: | Agradecimentos: The authors are grateful to CAPES for financial support Abstract: The purpose of this paper was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that compared muscle hypertrophy and strength gains between resistance training protocols employing very low (VLL35 RM), low (LL30%-59% of 1RM, or 16–35 RM), moderate (ML60%-79% of 1RM, or 8 -15RM) and high load (HL=80% of 1RM, or =7 RM) with matched volume loads (sets x reps x weight). A pooled analysis of the standardized mean difference for 1RM strength outcomes across the studies showed a benefit favoring HL vs. LL and vs. ML; and favoring ML vs. LL. Results from LL and VLL indicated little difference. A pooled analysis of the standardized mean difference for hypertrophy outcomes across all studies showed no differences between the training loads. Our findings indicate that, when volume load is equated between conditions, the highest loads induce superior dynamic strength gains. Alternatively, hypertrophic adaptations are similar irrespective of the magnitude of load. NOVELTY BULLETS:• Training with higher loads elicits greater gains in 1RM muscle strength when compared to lower loads, even when volume load is equated between conditions. • Muscle hypertrophy is similar irrespective of the magnitude of load, even when volume load is equated between conditions COORDENAÇÃO DE APERFEIÇOAMENTO DE PESSOAL DE NÍVEL SUPERIOR - CAPES fechado |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |