Sources of psychological distress among primary care physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic's first wave in Spain: a cross-sectional study
Autor: | Cebrian-Cuenca A, Mira J, Caride-Miana E, Fernandez-Jimenez A, Orozco-Beltran D |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Primary Health Care Research and Development r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica instname r-ISABIAL. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica y Sanitaria de Alicante Primary health care research & development r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA |
ISSN: | 1463-4236 1477-1128 |
Popis: | BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic is affecting people worldwide. In Spain, the first wave was especially severe. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify sources and levels of distress among Spanish primary care physicians (PCPs) during the first wave of the pandemic (April 2020). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a survey that included sociodemographic data, a description of working conditions related to distress [such as gaps in training in protective measures, cleaning, and hygiene procedures in work setting, unavailability of personal protective equipments (PPEs) and COVID-19 RT-PCR test, and lack of staff due to be infected] and a validated scale, the 'Self-applied Acute Stress Scale' (EASE). The survey was answered by a non-probability sampling of PCPs working in family healthcare centres from different regions of Spain. Analysis of variance and multivariate linear regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: In all, out of 518 PCP participants, 123 (23.7%) obtained high psychological distress scores. Only half of them had received information about the appropriate use of PPE. PCP characteristics associated with higher levels of distress include female gender [1.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54, 2.84]; lack of training in protective measures (1.96; 95% CI 0.94, 2.99); unavailable COVID-19 RT-PCR for health care workers after quarantine or COVID-19 treatment (-0.77 (-1.52, -0.02). Reinforcing disinfection of the work environment (P < 0.05), availability of PPEs (P < 0.05), and no healthcare professional was infected (P < 0.05) were related to the lowest distress score. CONCLUSIONS: A better understanding of the sources of distress among PCPs could prevent its effect on future outbreaks. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |