Montelukast as an adjuvant to mainstay therapies in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis

Autor: Topuz, Bülent, Ögmen, G.G.
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2003
Předmět:
Male
drug safety
physician attitude
patient satisfaction
phase 1 clinical trial
Acetates
nasal pruritus
nose irritation
Mometasone furoate
increased appetite
Prospective Studies
xerostomia
Pregnadienediols
seasonal variation
adult
article
adjuvant therapy
clinical trial
Loratadine
Middle Aged
Loratidine
nose disease
nose congestion
aged
female
priority journal
montelukast
Histamine H1 Antagonists
Quinolines
Drug Therapy
Combination

headache
corticosteroid
Efficacy
leukotriene receptor blocking agent
side effect
Adolescent
epistaxis
maintenance therapy
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
Leukotriene receptor antagonist
sneezing
Rhinoconjunctivitis
Adjuvants
Immunologic

Humans
controlled study
irritability
human
allergic rhinitis
controlled clinical trial
phase 3 clinical trial
Rhinitis
Allergic
Seasonal

drowsiness
major clinical study
clinical feature
drug efficacy
phase 2 clinical trial
antihistaminic agent
Leukotriene Antagonists
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2003.01690.x
Popis: Background: Drug selection for optimal treatment of allergic rhinitis may be difficult and involve many diverse factors. Objective: To evaluate montelukast, in the treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, as an adjuvant to mainstay therapies, i.e., antihistamines and corticosteroids. Methods: The study was a prospective, three-phased (per lasted 2 weeks) clinical trial. In phase I, patients were separated into two groups, based on the predominating symptoms: (1) runners (patients with moderate to severe sneezing/itchy, watery nose/itchy, watery eyes), and (2) blockers (patients with moderate to severe nasal congestion). The runners received antihistamine loratidine 10mg daily, and the blockers received intranasal corticosteroid mometasone furoate 200 μg. In phase II, if patients were dissatisfied with the initial treatment, they were assigned to receive another study drug additionally. In phase III, for the patients unsatisfied with the treatment of loratidine plus mometasone furoate, montelukast 10 mg once daily was added. Results: Of the 169 patients who entered phase I, 150 could be evaluated for treatment efficacy and safety. There were 108 runners and 42 blockers. Physicians' and patients' assessments indicated that in phase I 58 runners (60.0% of 50 runners) and 36 blockers (33.3% of six blockers) were satisfied with their therapy. In phase II, 30 runners (27.7%) and two blockers (4.7%) were satisfied with the addition of other study drug. Totally 62.6% of patients were satisfied at the end of phase I, and 84.0% at the end of phase II. Sixteen patients (66.6% of 24 patients) were satisfied with the addition of montelukast to the previous two drugs (in total, 10.6% of patients). Fourteen patients (12.2%) treated with loratadine, and three patients (0.3%) treated with mometasone, reported side-effect. Conclusion: The results of this trial indicate that 10% of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis may be treated with the supplement of montelukast to mainstay therapy.
Databáze: OpenAIRE