Conditions for mould growth on typical interior surfaces
| Autor: | Møller, Eva B., Andersen, Birgitte, Rode, Carsten, Peuhkuri, Ruut Hannele |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Møller, E B, Andersen, B, Rode, C & Peuhkuri, R 2017, ' Conditions for mould growth on typical interior surfaces ', Energy Procedia, vol. 132, pp. 171-176 . Møller, E B, Andersen, B, Rode, C & Peuhkuri, R H 2017, ' Conditions for mould growth on typical interior surfaces ', Energy Procedia, vol. 132, pp. 171-176 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.680 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.680 |
| Popis: | Prediction of the risk for mould growth is an important parameter for the analysis and design of the hygrothermal performance of building constructions. However, in practice the mould growth does not always follow the predicted behavior described by the mould growth models. This is often explained by uncertainty in the real conditions of exposure. In this study, laboratory experiments were designed to determine mould growth at controlled transient climate compared to growth at constant climate. The experiment included three building materials with four different surface treatments. The samples were inoculated with 8 common indoor moulds. Even after 40 weeks no growth was observed on any sample. The paper describes different hypotheses for the missing growth, and how these have been tested. Prediction of the risk for mould growth is an important parameter for the analysis and design of the hygrothermal performance of building constructions. However, in practice the mould growth does not always follow the predicted behavior described by the mould growth models. This is often explained by uncertainty in the real conditions of exposure. In this study, laboratory experiments were designed to determine mould growth at controlled transient climate compared to growth at constant climate. The experiment included three building materials with four different surface treatments. The samples were inoculated with 8 common indoor moulds. Even after 40 weeks no growth was observed on any sample. The paper describes different hypotheses for the missing growth, and how these have been tested. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|