| Přispěvatelé: |
Olcay, A., Istanbul Medipol University, Department of Cardiology, Istanbul, Turkey, Guler, E., Istanbul Medipol University, Department of Cardiology, Istanbul, Turkey, Karaca, I.O., Istanbul Medipol University, Department of Cardiology, Istanbul, Turkey, Omaygenc, M.O., Istanbul Medipol University, Department of Cardiology, Istanbul, Turkey, Kizilirmak, F., Istanbul Medipol University, Department of Cardiology, Istanbul, Turkey, Olgun, E., Istanbul Medipol University, Department of Cardiology, Istanbul, Turkey, Yenipinar, E., Istanbul Medipol University, Department of Cardiology, Istanbul, Turkey, Cakmak, H.A., Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Istanbul, Turkey, Duman, D., Istanbul Medipol University, Department of Cardiology, Istanbul, Turkey |
| Popis: |
WOS: 000362273800008 PubMed ID: 25840403 Use of last fluoro hold (LFH) mode in fluoroscopy, which enables the last live image to be saved and displayed, could reduce radiation during percutaneous coronary intervention when compared with cine mode. No previous study compared coronary angiography radiation doses and image quality between LFH and conventional cine mode techniques. Methods. We compared cumulative dose-area product (DAP), cumulative air kerma, fluoroscopy time, contrast use, interobserver variability of visual assessment between LFH angiography, and conventional cine angiography techniques. Forty-six patients were prospectively enrolled into the LFH group and 82 patients into the cine angiography group according to operator decision. Results. Mean cumulative DAP was higher in the cine group vs the LFH group (50058.98 +/- 53542.71 mGy.cm(2) vs 11349.2 +/- 8796.46 mGy.cm(2); P |
