Comparison between two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography bifurcation analyses for the assessment of bifurcation lesions: A subanalysis of the TRYTON pivotal IDE coronary bifurcation trial
Autor: | Muramatsu, Takashi, Grundeken, MJ, Ishibashi, Y, Nakatani, S, Girasis, Chrysafios, Campos, CA, Morel, Marie-Angele, Jonker, H, de Winter, RJ, Wykrzykowska, Joanna, Garcia Garcia, Hector, Leon, MB, Serruys, PWJC (Patrick), Onuma, Yoshinobu |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2015 |
Zdroj: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 86(3), E140-E149. Wiley-Liss Inc. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 86(3), E140-E149. Wiley-Liss Inc. |
ISSN: | 1522-1946 |
Popis: | BackgroundThree-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) provides more accurate measurements by minimizing inherent limitations of two-dimensional (2D) QCA. The aim of this study was to compare the measurements between 2D and 3D QCA analyses in bifurcation lesions. Methods and ResultsA total of 114 cases with non-left main bifurcation lesions in the TRYTON pivotal IDE Coronary Bifurcation Trial (: NCT01258972) were analyzed using a validated bifurcation QCA software (CAAS 5.10, Pie Medical Imaging, Maastricht, the Netherlands). All cases were analyzed in matched projections between pre- and post-procedure. The 2D analysis was performed using one of two angiographic images used for 3D reconstruction showing a larger distal bifurcation angle. In the treated segments (stent and balloon), there were no differences in minimal luminal diameter (MLD) between 2D and 3D, while diameter stenosis (DS) was significantly higher in 2D compared to 3D both pre-procedure and post-procedure (53.9% for 2D vs. 52.1% for 3D pre-procedure, P |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |