| Autor: |
STRAND, Niklas, AUGUSTO, Bruno, GOHL, Irene, STOLL, Johann, PUENTE GUILLEN, Pablo, BRUYAS, Marie-Pierre, JAUSSEIN, Marie, GALLOUIN, Evan, PERLET, Klaus, PETERSSON, Mats, JOHANSSON, Regina, MELTZER, Elin, LJUNG AUST, Mikael, BRAEUTIGAM, Julia, Large, David |
| Přispěvatelé: |
Swedish national Road and Transport Research institute, VTI, AUDI AG, Toyota Motor Europe, TME, Laboratoire Ergonomie et Sciences Cognitives pour les Transports (IFSTTAR/TS2/LESCOT), Institut Français des Sciences et Technologies des Transports, de l'Aménagement et des Réseaux (IFSTTAR)-Université de Lyon, BMW, Volvo Car Corporation, VCC, Federal Highway Research Institute, BAST, University of Nottingham, IFSTTAR - Institut Français des Sciences et Technologies des Transports, de l'Aménagement et des Réseaux |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2018 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
[Research Report] IFSTTAR-Institut Français des Sciences et Technologies des Transports, de l'Aménagement et des Réseaux. 2018, 99 p |
| Popis: |
The process of developing new automotive systems includes various testing cycles to assure a save operation in traffic. Physical system testing on test tracks is very important for this purpose, but rather expensive and might only become possible in later stages of the development process. Using a virtual simulation environment offers a safe possibility of testing new systems in early stages of development. Aditionally, driver-in-the-loop tests at test track and in a virtual simulator make it possible to evaluate driver reaction and potential acceptance by the future users of those systems. Within PROSPECT the new functions are investigated under various aspects in several simulator studies and test track studies. This deliverable D7.3 gives detailed information of conduction and results of the each study. Three studies focus exclusively on the for Vulnerable Road Users (VRUs) specifically dangerous urban intersection scenarios. The first of those studies examines the driver behaviour in a turning situation when a byciclist might be crossing. The described phenomena are looked-but-failed-to-see and failed-to-look. The second study, which provides an initial step in this line of research, analyzed the acceptance of issued forward collision warning times. The positioning of the potential accident opponent and the subjective feeling towards the criticality of the situation by the driver were key parameters taken into account. Last, but not least the acceptance of an intersection assist autonomous emergency braking systems was tested regarding the acceptance of potential buyers. The study was run for five days in a row for each participant to be able to judge the behaviour in a comuting situation. Two studies focused on longitudinal scenarios. Both studies followed the same design, but one was conducted on a test track and the other one in a simulator. The main objective was to investigate drivers reactions to FCW warnings and Active Steering interventions in critical VRU scenarios in case of a distraction of the driver. Additionally, the test track study was used to validate the results from the simulator study. The results of those studies are the basis for a wide acceptance evaluation of the systems. No system is an asset in increasing road safety if it is not accepted by the user and therefore turned off, if it is not required the system to be default on in consumer tests. Complemented by an additional acceptance study where the participants had to give their opinion of those systems after they watched videos of dangerous situations, the acceptance was analyzed based on questionnaires developed in PROSPECT and reported in Deliverable 7.2. This wholistic approach allows an expert discussion on the potentials of the PROSPECT functions in the future. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
