When a FrameNet-style knowledge description meets an ontological characterization of Fundamental Legal Concepts
| Autor: | Agnoloni Tommaso, Barrera Merixtell Fernandez, Sagri Maria Teresa, Tiscornia Daniela, Venturi Giulia |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2010 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | AICOL, AI Approaches to Complexity of Legal Systems workshop of the 24th World Congress on Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, pp. 93–112, Beijing, China, September 19, 2009 info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Agnoloni Tommaso, Barrera Merixtell Fernandez, Sagri Maria Teresa, Tiscornia Daniela, Venturi Giulia/congresso_nome:AICOL, AI Approaches to Complexity of Legal Systems workshop of the 24th World Congress on Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy/congresso_luogo:Beijing, China,/congresso_data:September 19, 2009/anno:2010/pagina_da:93/pagina_a:112/intervallo_pagine:93–112 |
| Popis: | The need for bridging the gap between linguistically-oriented knowledge resources (i.e. lexicons) and domain-oriented ones (i.e. ontologies) is acknowledged within both the NLP and the AI&Law community. In this paper we propose to face this need by comparing a FrameNet-style and an ontological characterization of the obligation Fundamental Legal Concept. In particular, we carried out a case-study aimed at investigating whether and to which extent different views on this Fundamental Legal Concept offered by the FrameNet resource can be mapped to an ontological characterization of the complex concept of public function, stemmed from the basic normative position obligation. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|