| Autor: |
Mangano, Maria, Cristina, Berlino, Manuel, Corbari, Laura, Milisenda, Giacomo, Lucchese, Marta, Terzo, Stella, Bosh-Belmar, Mar, Azaza, Mohamed, Salah, Babarro, Jose, M, F, Bakiu, Rigers, Broitman, Bernardo, R, Buschmann, Alejandro, Christofoletti, Ronaldo, Dong, Yunwei, Glamuzina, Branko, Luthman, Ola, Makridis, Pavlos, Nogueira, Antonio, Palomo, Maria, Gabriela, Dineshram, Ramadoss, Sanchez-Jerez, Pablo, Sevgili, Hüseyin, Troell, Max, AbouelFadl, Khaled, Azra, Mohamad, N, Britz, Peter, Carrington, Emily, Celić, Igor, Choi, Francis, Qin, Chuanxin, Dionísio, M, A, Dobroslavić, Tatjana, Galli, Paolo, Giannetto, Daniela, Grabowski, Jonathan, Helmuth, Brian, Lebata-Ramos, Ma, Junemie, Hazel, Lim, Po, Teen, Liu. Yajie, Martínez-Llorens, Silvia, Mirto, Simone, Pećarević, Marijana, Pita, Cristina, Ragg, Norman, Ravagnan, Elisa, Saidi, Djamal, Schultz, Keith, Shaltout, Mohamed, Tan, Shau, Hwai, Thiyagarajan, Vengatesen, Sara', Gianluca |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2022 |
| Předmět: |
|
| DOI: |
10.1016/j.envsci.2021.10.014. |
| Popis: |
The COVID-19 global pandemic has had severe, unpredictable and synchronous impacts on all levels of perishable food supply chains (PFSC), across multiple sectors and spatial scales. Aquaculture plays a vital and rapidly expanding role in food security, in some cases overtaking wild caught fisheries in the production of high- quality animal protein in this PFSC. We performed a rapid global assessment to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and related emerging control measures on the aquaculture supply chain. Socio-economic effects of the pandemic were analysed by surveying the perceptions of stakeholders, who were asked to describe potential supply-side disruption, vulnerabilities and resilience patterns along the production pipeline with four main supply chain components: a) hatchery, b) production/processing, c) distribution/logistics and d) market. We also assessed different farming strategies, comparing land- vs. sea-based systems ; extensive vs. intensive methods ; and with and without integrated multi-trophic aquaculture, IMTA. In addition to evaluating levels and sources of economic distress, interviewees were asked to identify mitigation solutions adopted at local / internal (i.e., farm-site) scales, and to express their preference on national / external scale mitigation measures among a set of a priori options. Survey responses identified the potential causes of disruption, ripple effects, sources of food insecurity, and socio-economic conflicts. They also pointed to various levels of mitigation strategies. The collated evidence represents a first baseline useful to address future disaster- driven responses, to reinforce the resilience of the sector and to facilitate the design reconstruction plans and mitigation measures, such as financial aid strategies. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
