| Autor: |
Singh, Ben, Cadenas-Sanchez, Cristina, da Costa, Bruno G.G., Castro-Piñero, José, Chaput, Jean-Philippe, Cuenca-García, Magdalena, Maher, Carol, Marín-Jiménez, Nuria, McGrath, Ryan, Molina-Garcí, Pablo, Myers, Jonathan, Gower, Bethany, Ortega, Francisco B., Lang, Justin J., Tomkinson, Grant R. |
| Zdroj: |
Journal of Sport and Health Science; 20240101, Issue: Preprints |
| Abstrakt: |
•We meta-analyzed 42 studies representing 35 cohorts and 3.8 million adults to compare the associations of objectively measured exercise-estimated, and non-exercise-estimated cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) with all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in adults.•We found 14% and 16% reductions in all-cause and CVD mortality risk per higher metabolic equivalent of task ((MET) i.e., 3.5 mL/kg/min), respectively, with no differences in risk reduction between objectively measured, exercise-estimated, and non-exercise-estimated CRF.•Exercise and non-exercise estimated CRF provide practical and robust alternatives to the more costly and time-consuming objectively measured CRF to enhance patient risk stratification in clinical settings. |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
