| Autor: |
Castro-López, R., López-Orona, C. A., Martínez-Gallardo, J. A., Tirado-Ramírez, M. A., Gómez, G., Rubio-Aragón, W., Edeza-Urias, J. A., Villa-Medina, M. C. |
| Zdroj: |
Journal of Nematology; March 2024, Vol. 56 Issue: 1 |
| Abstrakt: |
Mexico is the 8thlargest producer of tomatoes. Meloidogyne enterolobiiis reported in Sinaloa, affecting tomato cultivars with genetic resistance to Meloidogynespp. We aimed to evaluate field applications of fluopyram, fluensulfone, and fluazaindolizine treatments for managing M. enterolobiion tomatoes. Experiments were set on raised beds in a shade house. Nematicides were applied via drip irrigation. Under fluopyram treatment, M. enterolobiidid not reduce the number of extra-large-size fruits. The number of large-size fruits with fluopyram and fluazaindolizine plus fluopyram treatments was also unaffected by M. enterolobii. Yield from the treatments fluopyram, fluazaindolizine plus fluopyram, and fluensulfone plus fluopyram was similar to the control treatment without M. enterolobii. Finally, fluazaindolizine plus fluopyram, fluopyram, and fluensulfone plus fluopyram treatments showed the highest reduction of root galling. We conclude that the fluopyram was more effective as an individual treatment. Pre-plant applications of fluensulfone and fluazaindolizine reduced the damage to the plant and the loss of yield; however, the complementary application of fluorinated nematicides improved the management of M. enterolobiiin the tomato crop. |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
