| Autor: |
Kingsmore, David, White, Richard D, Mestres, Gaspar, Stephens, Mike, Calder, Francis, Papadakis, Georgios, Aitken, Emma, Jackson, Andrew, Inston, Nick, Jones, Rob G, Geddes, Colin, Stevenson, Karen, Szabo, Laszlo, Thomson, Peter, Stove, Callum, Kasthuri, Ram, Edgar, Ben, Tozzi, Matteo, Franchin, Marco, Sivaprakasam, Rajesh, Karydis, Nikolaos |
| Zdroj: |
The Journal of Vascular Access; 20240101, Issue: Preprints |
| Abstrakt: |
Although randomised controlled trials (RCT) are considered the optimal form of evidence, there are relatively few in surgery. Surgical RCT are particularly likely to be discontinued with poor recruitment cited as a leading reason. Surgical RCT present challenges over and above those seen in drug trials as the treatment under study may vary between procedures, between surgeons in one unit, and between units in multi-centred RCT. The most contentious and debated area of vascular access remains the role of arteriovenous grafts, and thus the quality of the data that is used to support opinions, guidelines and recommendations is critical. The aim of this review was to determine the extent of variation in the planning and recruitment in all RCT involving AVG. The findings of this are stark: there have been only 31 RCT performed in 31 years, the vast majority of which exhibited major limitations severe enough to undermine the results. This underlines the need for better quality RCT and data, and further inform the design of future studies. Perhaps most fundamental is the planning for a RCT that accounts for the intended population, the uptake of a RCT and the attrition for the significant co-morbidity in this population. |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
