| Autor: |
Hørmann Thomsen, Trine, Schou Nielsen, Nick, Lou Isenberg, Asher, Hougaard Møller, Michael, Bøje Clausen, Jesper, Mona Schack Frederiksen, Inge, Olsen, Louise, Javidi, Mahsa, Vilhelmsen, Jeanet, Klee Olsen, Marc, Biering-Sørensen, Bo |
| Zdroj: |
Parkinson's Disease; 2024, Vol. 2024 Issue: 1 |
| Abstrakt: |
Background. Testing and titration of the right levodopa equivalent dose are usually performed during a hospital admission. However, optimal dose titration in people with Parkinson’s disease (PwPs) may depend on home environment, emotional stress, and physical activity of everyday life. Objective. Firstly, to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a home-based LCIG titration program and patients’/caregivers’ satisfaction. Secondly, to identify barriers and facilitators for home-based titration. Method. This study assesses the feasibility and safety of home-based titration of levodopa duodenal infusions with the use of self-reported evaluation questionnaires with open-ended questions included, registration of total time used, and number of contacts/visits. A telemedicine solution was used to remotely monitor the patients, adjust treatment, and provide support and guidance to patients and caregivers. Results. Ten of 12 PwPs (5 females and 7 males) completed the total titration program. Eight of the 12 PwPs were dependent on help. These 8 PwPs also had a high burden of nonmotor symptoms (NMS). Cognitive impairments varied in severity (range 16–30). Time spent with home visits was on average 93.4 minutes (ranging from 35 to 180 minutes), and the length of the total titration (LCIG initiation to termination of titration) was on average 3.4 days with 2–5 (mean 3.2) contacts/visits with PD team members. The average score on the satisfaction evaluation questionnaires was lower in the caregiver group (mean 31.8) than the PwP outcome (mean 36.2). Conclusions. Telehealth-assisted home-based titration programs are feasible due to the length of the titration period, number of contacts, and time spent in PwPs’ private homes, are rated satisfactory and safe by PwPs and caregivers, and may be a substitute for in-hospital treatment. Clinical recommendations including facilitators and barriers from a patient/caregiver perspective are displayed. This trial is registered with NCT4196647. |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text