| Abstrakt: |
How convective boundary‐layer (CBL) processes modify fluxes of sensible (SH) and latent (LH) heat and CO2(Fc) in the atmospheric surface layer (ASL) remains a recalcitrant problem. Here, large eddy simulations for the CBL show that while SHin the ASL decreases linearly with height regardless of soil moisture conditions, LHand Fcdecrease linearly with height over wet soils but increase with height over dry soils. This varying flux divergence/convergence is regulated by changes in asymmetric flux transport between top‐down and bottom‐up processes. Such flux divergence and convergence indicate that turbulent fluxes measured in the ASL underestimate and overestimate the “true” surface interfacial fluxes, respectively. While the non‐closure of the surface energy balance persists across all soil moisture states, it improves over drier soils due to overestimated LH. The non‐closure does not imply that Fcis always underestimated; Fccan be overestimated over dry soils despite the non‐closure issue. Large swirling motions, called large turbulent eddies, efficiently transport water vapor, carbon dioxide, and heat up and down throughout the convective boundary layer (CBL). To what extent scalar fluxes in the atmospheric surface layer (ASL) are modulated by large turbulent eddies from the top of the CBL (i.e., top‐down eddies) remains a recalcitrant problem in many fields spanning atmospheric sciences, hydrology, ecology, and climate change. Here, high‐resolution computational simulations of the CBL show that scalar fluxes in the ASL linearly change with height across soil wetness conditions largely due to changes in the interactions of top‐down processes and bottom‐up surface exchange. Such linear height‐dependence of the fluxes indicates that reported fluxes from direct turbulent measurements in the ASL are not identical to their sought surface values. As a result, the non‐closure of the surface energy balance occurs across all soil moisture conditions but improves as soil becomes dry. CO2measured fluxes are underestimated over wet soils and overestimated over dry soils, which has its implication when interpreting CO2exchanges from global flux measuring networks utilizing turbulence theories. Height dependence of fluxes, which confirms that the constant flux layer assumption is not routinely satisfied, is a fundamental reason for the non‐closure. Asymmetric flux transport by bottom‐up and top‐down processes leads to varying flux divergence/convergence (FDC) in the surface layerLatent heat and CO2fluxes are underestimated when soil is wet and overestimated when dry, but sensible heat flux is always underestimatedNon‐closure of the surface energy balance is regulated by varying FDC and improves for dry soils due to overestimated latent heat flux Asymmetric flux transport by bottom‐up and top‐down processes leads to varying flux divergence/convergence (FDC) in the surface layer Latent heat and CO2fluxes are underestimated when soil is wet and overestimated when dry, but sensible heat flux is always underestimated Non‐closure of the surface energy balance is regulated by varying FDC and improves for dry soils due to overestimated latent heat flux |
Plný text