| Autor: |
Penttilä, Hannu J., Nuutinen, Lauri S., Kiviluoma, Kai T., Partanen, Anneli M. |
| Zdroj: |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia; October 1995, Vol. 42 Issue: 10 p862-868, 7p |
| Abstrakt: |
Sublingual triazolam 0.2 mg (T) was compared with peroral diazepam 10 mg (D) as a premedicant in a randomised, doubleblind study. Eighty-one ASA I-III patients aged 18– 70 yr, scheduled for elective surgery and general anaesthesia were studied. The patients were premedicated about one hour preoperatively. The T-group subjects (n = 41) received triazolam sl after a placebo po and the D-group subjects (n = 40) diazepam po before a sl placebo. Anxiety and sedation were evaluated before premedication, every 15 min after that until the patient was removed to the operating room, just before the induction of anaesthesia and both 30 and 60 min after operation. Anxiety and sedation were evaluated by the patient using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and by the anaesthetist with a scale of 0– 3 for anxiety and 0– 4 for sedation. The patients’ experiences with regards to their premedication and visit to the operating unit were investigated after the operation. In both groups sedation and anxiolysis became different at 30– 45 min after premedication, but at the time just before the induction of anaesthesia there was sedation and anxiolysis only in the T-group. There was no difference between the groups at any time. The T-group patients were more satisfied with their premedication and visit to the operating unit. The study drugs did not cause any cardiorespiratory or other side effects. We conclude that triazolam 0.2 mg sl is at least as effective a premedication as diazepam 10 mg po, that it is suitable for patients that cannot swallow, and that the patients were more satisfied with it than with diazepam. |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink