| Autor: |
Külkamp, Wladymir, Rosa-Junior, Jairo L, Ache-Dias, Jonathan, Carminatti, Lorival J |
| Zdroj: |
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology; March 2024, Vol. 238 Issue: 1 p83-92, 10p |
| Abstrakt: |
Some studies have reported considerable errors in the movement velocity measurement when using the My Lift app. This study aimed to investigate whether these errors may be related to the use of a range of movement (ROM) statically measured prior to the movement (ROMMYLIFT) instead of ROM dynamically monitored. Ten young adults performed two repetitions of the bench press exercise on a Smith machine with loads that allowed two velocity conditions (above and below 0.6 m s−1). The exercises were monitored by the My Lift app, a magnet and a rotary encoder. After, 15 older adults performed the same exercise at different percentages of 1RM, monitored by the My Lift app and a magnet. The results revealed that ROM dynamically obtained by encoder (reference method) with the mean velocity above (0.497 ± 0.069 m) and below (0.450 ± 0.056 m) 0.6 m s−1were quite different (p < 0.05; large effect) from the ROMMYLIFT(0.385 ± 0.040 m). These errors provided highly biased and heteroscedastic mean velocity measurements (mean errors approximately 22%). The errors observed in adults were also observed in the older participants, except for loads equal to 85% of 1RM. The magnet method proved to be valid, presenting measurements very close to the encoder (mean errors approximately 1.7%; r> 0.99). In conclusion, the use of ROMMYLIFTis inadequate, as the higher the movement velocity, the higher the errors, both for young and older adults. Thus, to improve the measurement of the My Lift app, it is recommended that the magnet method be used in conjunction with the app to more accurately determine the ROM. |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
