| Autor: |
Cooke, S.J., Young, N., Donaldson, M.R., Nyboer, E.A., Roche, D.G., Madliger, C.L., Lennox, R.J., Chapman, J.M., Faulkes, Z., Bennett, J.R. |
| Zdroj: |
Facets; August 2021, Vol. 6 Issue: 1 p1753-1770, 18p |
| Abstrakt: |
For better or for worse, authorship is a currency in scholarly research and advancement. In scholarly writing, authorship is widely acknowledged as a means of conferring credit but is also tied to concepts such as responsibility and accountability. Authorship is one of the most divisive topics both at the level of the research team and more broadly in the academy and beyond. At present, authorship is often the primary way to assert and receive credit in many scholarly pursuits and domains. Debates rage, publicly but mostly privately, regarding authorship. Here we attempt to clarify key concepts related to authorship informed by our collective experiences and anchored in relevant contemporary literature. Rather than dwelling on the problems, we focus on proactive strategies for creating more just, equitable, and transparent avenues for minimizing conflict around authorship and where there is adequate recognition of the entire process of knowledge generation, synthesis, sharing, and application with partners within and beyond the academy. We frame our ideas around 10 strategies that collectively constitute a roadmap for avoiding and overcoming challenges associated with authorship decisions. |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
