Comparison of Methods Based on Different Molecular Epidemiological Markers for Typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosisComplex Strains: Interlaboratory Study of Discriminatory Power and Reproducibility

Autor: Kremer, K., van Soolingen, D., Frothingham, R., Haas, W. H., Hermans, P. W. M., Marti´n, C., Palittapongarnpim, P., Plikaytis, B. B., Riley, L. W., Yakrus, M. A., Musser, J. M., van Embden, J. D. A.
Zdroj: Journal of Clinical Microbiology; August 1999, Vol. 37 Issue: 8 p2607-2618, 12p
Abstrakt: ABSTRACTIn this study, the currently known typing methods forMycobacterium tuberculosisisolates were evaluated with regard to reproducibility, discrimination, and specificity. Therefore, 90 M. tuberculosiscomplex strains, originating from 38 countries, were tested in five restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) typing methods and in seven PCR-based assays. In all methods, one or more repetitive DNA elements were targeted. The strain typing and the DNA fingerprint analysis were performed in the laboratory most experienced in the respective method. To examine intralaboratory reproducibility, blinded duplicate samples were included. The specificities of the various methods were tested by inclusion of 10 non-M. tuberculosiscomplex strains. All five RFLP typing methods were highly reproducible. The reliability of the PCR-based methods was highest for the mixed-linker PCR, followed by variable numbers of tandem repeat (VNTR) typing and spoligotyping. In contrast, the double repetitive element PCR (DRE-PCR), IS6110inverse PCR, IS6110ampliprinting, and arbitrarily primed PCR (APPCR) typing were found to be poorly reproducible. The 90 strains were best discriminated by IS6110RFLP typing, yielding 84 different banding patterns, followed by mixed-linker PCR (81 patterns), APPCR (71 patterns), RFLP using the polymorphic GC-rich sequence as a probe (70 patterns), DRE-PCR (63 patterns), spoligotyping (61 patterns), and VNTR typing (56 patterns). We conclude that for epidemiological investigations, strain differentiation by IS6110RFLP or mixed-linker PCR are the methods of choice. A strong association was found between the results of different genetic markers, indicating a clonal population structure of M. tuberculosisstrains. Several separate genotype families within the M. tuberculosiscomplex could be recognized on the basis of the genetic markers used.
Databáze: Supplemental Index