In Vitro Activities of Ramoplanin, Teicoplanin, Vancomycin, Linezolid, Bacitracin, and Four Other Antimicrobials against Intestinal Anaerobic Bacteria

Autor: Citron, D. M., Merriam, C. V., Tyrrell, K. L., Warren, Y. A., Fernandez, H., Goldstein, E. J. C.
Zdroj: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; July 2003, Vol. 47 Issue: 7 p2334-2338, 5p
Abstrakt: ABSTRACTBy using an agar dilution method, the in vitro activities of ramoplanin, teicoplanin, vancomycin, linezolid, and five other agents were determined against 300 gram-positive and 54 gram-negative strains of intestinal anaerobes. Ramoplanin was active at ≤2 μg/ml against 287 of 300 (95.7%) gram-positive organisms, including 18 strains of Clostridium difficilefor which MICs of ramoplanin were 0.25 to 0.5 μg/ml; for 3 of these, linezolid MICs were 8 to 16 μg/ml. Nineteen Clostridium innocuumstrains for which the vancomycin MIC at which 90% of strains were inhibited was 16 μg/ml were susceptible to ramoplanin at 0.06 to 0.25 μg/ml and to teicoplanin at 0.125 to 1.0 μg/ml. All strains of Eubacterium, Actinomyces, Propionibacterium, and Peptostreptococcusspp. were inhibited by ≤0.25 μg of ramoplanin per ml and ≤1 μg of vancomycin per ml. Ramoplanin was also active at ≤4 μg/ml against 15 of 22 of the Prevotellaand Porphyromonasstrains tested, but ramoplanin MICs for all 31 strains of the Bacteroides fragilisgroup, the Fusobacterium mortiferum-Fusobacterium variumgroup, and Veillonellaspp. were ≥256 μg/ml. Ramoplanin displays excellent activity against C. difficileand other gram-positive enteric anaerobes, including vancomycin-resistant strains; however, it has poor activity against most gram-negative anaerobes and thus potentially has a lesser effect on the ecological balance of normal fecal flora.
Databáze: Supplemental Index