| Autor: |
Brown, Samantha O., Effinger, Devin P., Montoro, Rodrigo A., Daddaoua, Nabil, Justinova, Zuzana, Moerke, Megan J., Schindler, Charles W., Jedema, Hank P., Bradberry, Charles W. |
| Zdroj: |
Neuropsychopharmacology; June 2022, Vol. 47 Issue: 7 p1398-1404, 7p |
| Abstrakt: |
Traditional approaches for evaluating if compounds are reinforcing, and thus a risk for abuse, include preclinical self-administration procedures conducted in the absence of alternative reinforcers. While the track record of this approach for determining abuse potential is good, that for predicting efficacy of addiction treatments is not. An alternate approach would be economic choice between drug and nondrug rewards, with parametrically varied options from trial to trial. This would promote goal-directed decisions between reward modalities and should provide metrics that reflect changes in internal state that influence desirability of a given option. We report herein a high throughput economic choice procedure in which squirrel monkeys choose between a short-lived opiate, remifentanil, and a palatable food reward. Stimuli on touchscreens indicate the amount of each reward type offered by varying the number of reward-specific elements. The rapid clearance of remifentanil avoids accumulation of confounding levels of drug, and permits a large number of trials with a wide range of offers of each reward modality. The use of a single metric encompassing multiple values of each reward type within a session enables estimation of indifference values using logistic regression. This indifference value is sensitive to reward devaluation within each reward domain, and is therefore a useful metric for determining shifts in reward preference, as shown with satiation and pharmacological treatment approaches. |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink