| Abstrakt: |
In 1991 in Indianapolis, IN, an appropriations bill was brought to the floor of the Indiana General Assembly for debate. The bill included a $900 000 appropriation for the purchase of land to build a new state park in northwest Indiana. The park would be located in the district of Senator Mike Gery of West Lafayette, a legislator who had followed this issue very closely over several years. It was an issue that was volatile in his home district. When Senator Gery had his chance to publicly debate and vote on this issue on the senate floor, he knew his constituents would be watching closely. This case presents Senator Gery's decision-making dilemma on an issue that was extremely important to his constituents. Senator Gery knew there was a large core of park supporters among his constituents. However, there was also a significant group who actively opposed the park, including one family who would lose a substantial portion of their farming operation if the park was established. Senator Gery was concerned for his constituents and wanted to do what was best for them. He wanted to take an action that would minimize hostile reactions, but he also wanted to make the best land use decision for the future of his district. Each side put forth convincing arguments that Senator Gery had to consider. Through this case, students will gain an understanding of the technical factors and ethical issues involved in land use decisions. |
Plný text