| Autor: |
Snyder, Lori Unruh, Gallo, Maria, Fulford, Stephen G., Irani, Tracy, Rudd, Rick, DiFino, Sharon M., Durham, Timothy C. |
| Zdroj: |
Journal of Natural Resources & Life Sciences Education; 2008, Vol. 37 Issue: 1 p27-31, 5p |
| Abstrakt: |
Genetically modified (GM) crops such as maize (Zea maysL.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.), soybean [Glycine max(L.) Moench], and canola (Brassica rapaL.) have been widely adopted by American farmers. In spite of their use in the United States, the European Union (EU) imposed a 6-year de facto moratorium (1998–2004) on the cultivation/import of transgenic crops. Although the U.S. government has assured stakeholders of their safety, the EU continues to be an outspoken opponent. This can largely be attributed to a lack of trust in the regulatory process, and especially a cynical perspective on the underlying science and institutions that govern approval. Such disparities were illustrated in 2003 when the United States donated GM maize to aid African countries stricken by famine. Under purported EU threats of retaliatory trade sanctions, African officials refused the aid. An examination of this episode contrasts the potential discord between those affected and those who formulate government policy. Using resources from both sides of the debate, this scenario summarizes the pertinent issues regarding EU's refusal to the import transgenic crops. A group discussion and debate protocol was developed for facilitating small group and entire class consideration of the scenario while strengthening student critical thinking skills. |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text