| Abstrakt: |
This clinical trial evaluated the impact of metaphylactic antimicrobial administration 10 d before experimental inoculation with Mannheimia haemolytica(MH) to mitigate pulmonary lesions. Thirty-three crossbreed heifers were procured as a single group and were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 blocks and to treatment, tildipirosin (ZUP; 4 mg/kg) or tulathromycin (DRX; 2.5 mg/kg) or saline (SAL; 1 mL/45.5 kg), within block on arrival at Kansas State University. All trial procedures were staggered by 7-d intervals for each block, resulting in all animals within a block receiving treatment, challenge, and necropsy on the same dates. Heifers within each block received an endoscopic MH challenge 10 d following treatment administration (d 0) and were housed in individual indoor stalls for 3 d postchallenge. Clinical illness scores (CIS), respiration quality scores, appetite scores, and injection site reactions were recorded on all animals from d 0 through d 13. Rectal temperatures were measured once daily on all animals from d 8 through d 13. Heifers were necropsied, and lung lesions were evaluated on d 13. Lung lesion data were evaluated using nonparametric methods (Kruskall-Wallis), and standard least squares models were used to evaluate the remaining variables. The pulmonary lesion scores (percentage of affected lung) ranged from 3.3% to 39.8% for all heifers with 92% (11/12) of ZUP-treated heifers having <10% lesions. Tildipirosin-treated heifers had lower (P< 0.05) lung lesion scores when compared with DRX- and SAL-treated heifers. Lung weight expressed as a percentage of BW was lower (P< 0.05) in ZUP heifers compared to DRX- and SAL-treated heifers. The probability of receiving abnormal CIS, appetite scores, and respiratory scores was lower (P< 0.05) in ZUP-treated heifers compared to DRX- and SAL-treated animals. This study showed that heifers treated with tildipirosin 10 d before MH challenge have less pulmonary damage and fewer clinical signs of illness compared to heifers treated with DRX or SAL. |
