| Autor: |
Tombolini, P., Ruoppolo, M., Bellorofonte, C., Zaatar, C., Tagliaferri, A., Dell'Acqua, S., Cogni, M., Ferri, P.M. |
| Zdroj: |
Urologia; February 1997, Vol. 64 Issue: 1 p40-45, 6p |
| Abstrakt: |
There is still controversy among urologists on the best treatment for ureteric pelvic stones. Recent advances in ureteroscopy with new methods of stone fragmentation (laser, electrohydraulic and ballistic lithotripsy) and current availability of small semirigid and flexible ureteroscopes have made this procedure rapid, easy and safe. Similarly, improvement in ESWL technology has also facilitated identification and treatment of stones above the iliac bone ring. In just over eight years (3/'88 - 6/'96)we treated 355 ureteral pelvic stones. The first approach was ESWL in 252 cases (by Dornier HM3 in 176, Dornier MPL 9000 in 42, Piezolith Wolf 2300 in 39 and EM plus Dormia basket in 15), ureteroscopy in 38 (by electrohydraulic) lithotripsy in 31, ultrasound lithotripsy in 5 and Lithoclast in 2) and litholapaxy by Dormia basket in 58. The overall stone-free rate was 75.5%, 95.3% and 84.5% respectively. The second line of treatment in unsuccessful cases was ULL or Dormia basket extraction and ESWL in 7 cases only. The overall success rate was 100%. Only 3 patients underwent open surgery (0.7%). There were 5 cases of ureteral perforation during ULL, which did not require surgical repair. No major complications occurred with either ESWL or Dormia basket procedures. We consider in-situ ultrasound-guided ESWL as first choice in managing ureteral pelvic stones, as the procedure is rapid, safe and technically simple. Ureteroscopy is a salvage procedure after ESWL failure. Endoscopic removal by Dormia basket is still a safe, effective procedure for small stones. |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
