Abstrakt: |
We have examined the activation of the pituitary-adrenal axis in two lines of rats, the Roman high (RHA)- and low (RLA)-avoidance rats known to be emotionally different. These rats are selected for rapid acquisition of a conditioned avoidance response (RHA) compared with failure to acquire this response (RLA). In this study the endocrine response (ACTH, corticosterone, aldosterone) of RLA and RHA rats to two types of stress was examined: exposure to openfield stress for 10 min (Op) or exposure to ether vapours for 3 min (E). Basal plasma ACTH concentrations were lower in RLA than in RHA rats (RLA: 110·8 ± 24·5 ng/l; RHA: 252·7 ± 60·8 ng/l, P<0·05) but the absolute values of ACTH reached after both types of stress were comparable between RLA and RHA rats. Plasma corticosterone and aldosterone under resting conditions were not different between RLA and RHA rats. Plasma corticosterone was higher in RLA following openfield stress (P<0·05) while no differences between RLA and RHA were observed after ether stress (RHA: basal = 66±14·nmol/l, Op =384± 55, E= 606± 75; RLA: basal=121±52, Op = 612 ±92, E= 698 ± 89). Stressinduced increases in plasma aldosterone were higher in the RLA line after both types of stress (RHA: basal = 175±36 pmol/l, Op = 546±53, E= 563± 47; RLA: basal = 272 ± 64, Op =1246 ± 91, E= 863 ± 72). Pituitary responsiveness to exogenous corticotrophinreleasing factor (CRF) in vivoand in vitrodiffered in the two lines: administration of ovine CRF (10 μg/kg body weight, i.p.) resulted in significant increases in ACTH secretion but the response was significantly lower in RHA rats (RHA: 511·1 ±41·5 ng/l; RLA: 831·4 ± 70·3 ng/l, P<0·01). Dispersed pituitary cells from the RHA line exhibited a smaller response to CRF (10 nmol/l) treatment in vitrocompared with cells derived from the RLA rats (RHA: 750 ± 83% of control; RLA: 1374 ±79, P<0·01) suggesting differences in pituitary sensitivity to CRF between the two lines. Additional differences at the pituitary level were observed since the type II glucocorticoid receptor population in RHA rats was higher than in RLA rats (RHA: 246±13 fmol [3H]RU28362 bound/mg protein; RLA: 173±18, P<0·01). Similarly, hippocampal type I glucocorticoid receptor population was increased in RHA rats (RHA: 172·2 ± 8·3 fmol [3H]aldosterone bound/mg protein; RLA: 116·7±7·3, P< 0·01). It is concluded that first, differences in pituitary activity between RLA and RHA rats are distinct from changes observed at the adrenal level, secondly, increased stress-induced ACTH output in the RLA line is associated with enhanced pituitary sensitivity to CRF and possibly with diminished corticosterone inhibitory feedback action on CRF and ACTH secretion, and thirdly, the possible involvement of differences in the pattern of CRF secretion between RLA and RHA rats on resting pituitary ACTH secretion cannot be excluded.Journal of Endocrinology(1989) 123,477–485 |