Effectiveness of Probiotic for Primary Prevention of Clostridium difficileInfection: A Single-Center Before-and-After Quality Improvement Intervention at a Tertiary-Care Medical Center

Autor: Trick, William E., Sokalski, Stephen J., Johnson, Stuart, Bunnell, Kristen L., Levato, Joseph, Ray, Michael J., Weinstein, Robert A.
Zdroj: Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology; July 2018, Vol. 39 Issue: 7 p765-770, 6p
Abstrakt: OBJECTIVETo evaluate probiotics for the primary prevention of Clostridium difficileinfection (CDI) among hospital inpatients.DESIGNA before-and-after quality improvement intervention comparing 12-month baseline and intervention periods.SETTINGA 694-bed teaching hospital.INTERVENTIONWe administered a multispecies probiotic comprising L. acidophilus(CL1285), L. casei(LBC80R), and L. rhamnosus(CLR2) to eligible antibiotic recipients within 12 hours of initial antibiotic receipt through 5 days after final dose. We excluded (1) all patients on neonatal, pediatric and oncology wards; (2) all individuals receiving perioperative prophylactic antibiotic recipients; (3) all those restricted from oral intake; and (4) those with pancreatitis, leukopenia, or posttransplant. We defined CDI by symptoms plus C. difficiletoxin detection by polymerase chain reaction. Our primary outcome was hospital-onset CDI incidence on eligible hospital units, analyzed using segmented regression.RESULTSThe study included 251 CDI episodes among 360,016 patient days during the baseline and intervention periods, and the incidence rate was 7.0 per 10,000 patient days. The incidence rate was similar during baseline and intervention periods (6.9 vs 7.0 per 10,000 patient days; P=.95). However, compared to the first 6 months of the intervention, we detected a significant decrease in CDI during the final 6 months (incidence rate ratio, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.4–0.9; P=.009). Testing intensity remained stable between the baseline and intervention periods: 19% versus 20% of stools tested were C. difficilepositive by PCR, respectively. From medical record reviews, only 26% of eligible patients received a probiotic per the protocol.CONCLUSIONSDespite poor adherence to the protocol, there was a reduction in the incidence of CDI during the intervention, which was delayed ~6 months after introducing probiotic for primary prevention.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2018;765–770
Databáze: Supplemental Index