| Autor: |
Sacks, Elliot M., Fajardo, Laurie L., Hillman, Bruce J., Drach, George W., Gaines, John A., Claypool, H. Richard, Clinger, Neal J., Fillmore, David J., Hunt, K. Rebecca, Pond, Gerald D., Smyth, Stephen H. |
| Zdroj: |
The Journal of Urology; December 1990, Vol. 144 Issue: 6 p1341-1346, 6p |
| Abstrakt: |
Most publications citing the effectiveness of renal extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy have used plain abdominal radiography to assess residual calculi after treatment. We compared radiologist sensitivity and specificity in the detection of calculi on plain abdominal radiographs versus conventional film-screen and digital renal tomograms in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients. Of the patients 50 were imaged before and within 24hours after lithotripsy. Six radiologists evaluated the resultant 300 studies for the presence and location of calculi. The mean sensitivity for digital tomograms was 83% for pre-lithotripsy and post-lithotripsy studies, which was significantly higher than for plain abdominal radiography and conventional tomography after lithotripsy. However, there were significantly more false positive stone diagnoses associated with digital tomogram interpretation. Signal detection analysis verified the over-all superiority of digital tomography for post-extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy imaging. Calculus detection by conventional and digital tomography is superior to detection by plain abdominal radiography. However, because we did not perform delayed imaging, it is not possible to say what impact digital tomography might have on the management of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients. |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
