| Autor: |
Ravikrishna, Raghunathan, Valsaraj, KalliatT., Price, CynthiaB., Brannon, JamesM., Hayes, CharolettA., Yost, SallyL. |
| Zdroj: |
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association; December 2004, Vol. 54 Issue: 12 p1525-1533, 9p |
| Abstrakt: |
AbstractThe fate and transport of explosives in the soil pore vapor spaces affects both the potential detection of buried ordnance by chemical sensors and vadose zone transport of explosives residues. The efficacy of chemical sensors and their potential usefulness for detecting buried unex-ploded ordnance (UXO) is difficult to determine without understanding how its chemical signatures are transported through soil. The objectives of this study were to quantify chemical signature transport through soils under various environmental conditions in unsaturated soils and to develop a model for the same. Flux chambers, large soil containers, and batch tests were used to determine explosives signature movement and process descriptors for model development. Low signatures were observed for explosives (2,4-dinitrotoluene, 2,6-dinitrotoluene, and 1,3-dinitrobenzene) under all environmental conditions. A diffusion model was used to describe the chemical transport mechanism in the soil pore air. The soil-air partition constant was treated as a fit parameter in the model owing to the uncertainty in its a priori estimation. The model predictions of the trends in experimental fluxes and the soil concentration were only marginal at best. It was concluded that better estimates of the partition constant are required for more accurate estimation of the chemical concentration at the soil-air interface. Chemical sensors will need to be very sensitive because of low signatures. However, this may result in many false alarms because of explosives residues not associated with UXO on firing ranges. Low explosives signatures also should result in insignificant air environmental exposures. |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
