| Abstrakt: |
To improve on the quality of standards, FASB has taken certain initiatives. They include a plan to adopt a principles-based approach to standard setting, issue standards jointly with the IASB, and shorten the commentary period. These require participation from constituents. This study examines comment letters on five proposals, for an insight to the role of constituents in the due process and these initiatives. It points out significant limitations in prior research that claimed low participation among constituents. The manner in which FASB handles comment letters sometimes disaffects constituents. This can stall the quality initiative, and widen the expectations gap. From the comment letters, a majority of constituents accept a principles-based approach but apparently contradict themselves by requiring detailed guidance. The evidence shows that shorter commentary periods could hurt quality. Further, non-USA constituents addressed more questions and disagreed more with FASB's provisions. Implications for FASB's initiatives are explored. |
