| Autor: |
Labbok, M. H., Perez, A., Valdes, V., Sevilla, F., Wade, K., Laukaran, V. H., Cooney, K. A., Coly, S., Sanders, C., Queenan, J. T. |
| Zdroj: |
Advances in Contraception : The Official Journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception; June 1994, Vol. 10 Issue: 2 p93-109, 17p |
| Abstrakt: |
It is well accepted that breasteeding contributes significantly to child survival and child nutrition. Healthful child spacing is associated with improved birth outcomes and maternal recovery. On a population basis, breastfeeding may contribute more to birth spacing than all family planning use combined in many countries. However, while breastfeeding does provide a period of infertility, until recently, there was no reliable way for an individual woman to capitalize on this lactational infertility for her own efficatious child spacing. The Lactational Amenorrhea Method (LAM) is a new introductory family planning method that simultaneously promotes child spacing and breastfeeding, with its optimal nutrition and disease preventive benefits for the infant. LAM, as it is called, is based on the utilization of lactational infertility for protection from pregnancy and indicates the time for the introduction of a complementary family planning method. LAM is recommended for up to six months postpartum for women who are fully or nearly fully breastfeeding and amenorrheic, and relies on the maintenance of appropriate brastfeeding practices to prolong lactational infertility, with the concomitant delay in menses return. A recent clinical trial confirmed the theoretical 98% or higher effectiveness of the method and field trials are demonstrating its aceptability. Nonetheless, some demographers and family planning organizations continue to debate its value. The development, efficacy, and sequelae of the method are presented using data from several studies by the authors. |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink