Steve ENDRESS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. GENTIVA HEALTH SERVICES, INC., Ronald A. Malone, Anthony H. Strange, and John R. Potapchuk, Defendants.

Předmět:	SECURITIES fraud -- Law & legislation ACTIONS & defenses (Law) LEGAL motions UNITED States district courts PENSION trusts FEDERAL courts
Zdroj:	West's Federal Rules Decisions; 2011, Vol. 276, p62-64, 3p
Abstrakt:	The article discusses a court case Endress v. Gentiva Health Services, Inc. wherein the class action was filed by the plaintiff against the defendant due to putative securities fraud. The motion to intervene was filed by the plaintiff and the district court warranted the permissive intervention by the pension fund. The federal court of the U.S. granted the motion filed by the plaintiff in part and denied it in part.
Databáze:	Supplemental Index
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu