Autor: |
Bofill, James A., Vincent, Robert D., Ross, Elaine L., Martin, Rick W., Norman, Patricia F., Werhan, Carol F., Morrison, John C., Bofill, J A, Vincent, R D, Ross, E L, Martin, R W, Norman, P F, Werhan, C F, Morrison, J C |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology; Dec97, Vol. 177 Issue 6, p1465-1470, 6p, 2 Charts, 1 Graph |
Abstrakt: |
Objective: Our purpose was to examine the effect of epidural analgesia on dystocia-related cesarean delivery in actively laboring nulliparous women.Study Design: Active labor was confirmed in nulliparous women by uterine contractions, cervical dilatation of 4 cm, effacement of 80%, and fetopelvic engagement. Patients were randomized to one of two groups: epidural analgesia or narcotics. A strict protocol for labor management was in place. Patients recorded the level of pain at randomization and at hourly intervals on a visual analog scale. Elective outlet operative vaginal delivery was permitted.Results: One hundred women were randomized. No difference in the rate of cesarean delivery for dystocia was noted between the groups (epidural 8%, narcotic 6%; p = 0.71). No significant differences were noted in the lengths of the first (p = 0.54) or second (p = 0.55) stages of labor or in any other time variable. Women with epidural analgesia underwent operative vaginal delivery more frequently (p = 0.004). Pain scores were equivalent at randomization, but large differences existed at each hour thereafter. The number of patients randomized did not achieve prestudy estimates. A planned interim analysis of the results demonstrated that we were unlikely to find a statistically significant difference in cesarean delivery rates in a trial of reasonable duration.Conclusions: With strict criteria for the diagnosis of labor and with use of a rigid protocol for labor management, there was no increase in dystocia-related cesarean delivery with epidural analgesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
Externí odkaz: |
|