| Autor: |
Cécile Goujard, Fabienne Marcellin, Houria Hendel-Chavez, Marianne Burgard, Vincent Meiffrédy, Alain Venet, Christine Rouzioux, Yacine Taoufik, Raphaëlle El Habib, Maria Beumont-Mauviel, Jean-Pierre Aboulker, Yves Lévy, Jean-François Delfraissy |
| Zdroj: |
AIDS Research & Human Retroviruses; Sep2007, Vol. 23 Issue 9, p1105-1113, 9p |
| Abstrakt: |
HIV-specific T cell responses play a critical role in the control of infection. We evaluated the impact of immune-based interventions in patients first treated during primary HIV-1 infection (PHI). Forty-three patients were randomized within three groups, to receive either interleukin-2 (IL-2 group), or boosts of ALVAC-HIV (vCP1433) and LIPO-6T followed by interleukin-2 (Vac-IL2 group), compared with no immune intervention (control group), and were monitored for T cell responses. Impact of strategies on viral replication was subsequently assessed during long-term treatment interruption. HIV-specific CD4T cell responses did not change during the study period in immunized patients relative to controls, and vaccination had only a transient effect on interferon-γ-producing CD8 responses. Viral rebound after treatment interruption was similar in immunized patients and controls. Forty percent of patients had HIV RNA values <10,000 copiesml 12 weeks after interruption. The cumulative time off treatment represented almost half the total follow-up period. Immunological and virological status during PHI and HIV DNA load at interruption were predictive of the level of viral rebound after treatment interruption, whereas HIV RNA level during PHI and HIV DNA level at interruption were predictive of the time off treatment. Treatment interruption is safe in patients treated early after primary HIV infection. On the basis of this pilot study, HIV immunizations and interleukin-2 appear to have no supplementary benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
