| Autor: |
Sookoo, Susan, Reed, Val, Brown, Ian, Dean, Anne, Ross, Thomas |
| Zdroj: |
International Journal of Psychiatric Nursing Research; Jan2007, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p1446-1458, 13p |
| Abstrakt: |
Scope: Within an international network study involving four European countries (COMSKILLS), results on clinical-qualitative data are reported and discussed. A total of 103 semi-structured interviews were conducted, representing 45 per cent of the patients involved in the project (N=23 1). Method: The coding framework represents a means of identifying and measuring aspects of complexity and specificity in the way in which key workers talk about care in relation to individual patients. Results: Respondents talked about patient care most frequently in terms of coping behavior and working relationships with patients. The commonest method cited for information gathering was observation. Out of three conceptual levels, ranging from complex and specific responses (conceptual level 3), to relatively general and unspecific remarks (level 1), most responses were coded at Levels 1 or 2. Conclusions: Taking into account the apparent reluctance of many clinical staff to make use of standardized assessment instruments, systematic treatment-oriented methods able to both allow for valid and reliable assessments and to structure clinical experience is needed. It is expected that complexity and specificity care is referred to will profit from the regular use of such a method (e.g. the BEST-Index). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
