Comparative Efficacy of Monotherapy of Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitors Versus Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Treating Essential Hypertension – A Meta-analysis.

Autor: Rathod, Jaydeep Himmatlal, Kavathia, Shrenil Ashrut, Pandya, Tejas Rajendrakuamr, Rana, Devang Ashwinkumar
Předmět:
Zdroj: Apollo Medicine; Dec2024, Vol. 21 Issue 4, p299-307, 9p
Abstrakt: Background: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used medications for treating essential hypertension, but there is limited research comparing their effectiveness. To address this gap, a recent meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate and compare the efficacy of these two drug classes in decreasing blood pressure (BP) among patients with essential hypertension. Objective: Evaluating of comparative efficacy of ACEIs versus ARBs in reducing BP in essential hypertension. Methods: An extensive literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) following PRISMA guidelines (2020), with inclusion criteria of age ≥18 years, with either gender and diagnosed of essential hypertension and receiving ACEIs or ARBs for at least 4 weeks. Patients with secondary hypertension, malignancy, symptomatic cardiovascular system (CVS) disease, hepatic involvement, and studies with Fimasartan and Allisartan were excluded. For this study, all RCTs that reported changes in mean systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) before and after administration of the drugs were gathered. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated using RevMan 5.4.1 software. The significance level was set at a P < 0.05. Results: A total of 28 RCTs (n = 9778) were included in our study. Both groups reduce SBP and DBP from the baseline values. Pooled analyses of studies showed that ARBs were superior to ACEIs with SMD = 0.179 in the random-effect model, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.0975–0.260), P < 0.001, and in the fixed-effect model, SMD = 0.207, 95% CI (0.167–0.248), P < 0.001 in the mean reduction of SBP. Furthermore, for a mean reduction in DBP, ARBs were superior to ACEIs with SMD = 0.329 in the random-effect model, 95% CI (0.161–0.496), P < 0.001, and in the fixed-effect model, SMD = 0.317, 95% CI (0.276–0.357), P < 0.001. Our study included 28 RCTs with a combined sample size of 9778 participants. Both ACEIs and ARBs were found to effectively reduce SBP and DBP from their baseline values. However, our pooled analysis of the studies revealed that ARBs were more effective than ACEIs in reducing mean SBP, with an SMD of 0.179 in the random-effect model and 0.207 in the fixed-effect model. The 95% CIs for these estimates were (0.0975–0.260) and (0.167–0.248), respectively, with P < 0.001. Similarly, for a mean reduction in DBP, ARBs were found to be superior to ACEIs with a SMD of 0.329 in the random-effect model and 0.317 in the fixed-effect model, with 95% CIs of (0.161–0.496) and (0.276–0.357), respectively, and a P < 0.001. Conclusion: ARBs are more efficacious as compared to ACEIs in essential hypertension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Supplemental Index
Externí odkaz: