Social media use and patient ratings in shoulder and elbow surgeons: how many "likes" for five stars?

Autor: Busheme, Cara, Yerke Hansen, Payton, Desai, Ajay, Baran, Jessica V., Fomunung, Clyde, Jackson, Garrett R., Sabesan, Vani J.
Zdroj: Journal of Shoulder & Elbow Surgery; Dec2024, Vol. 33 Issue 12, p2755-2765, 11p
Abstrakt: Social media plays an important role in healthcare and physician selection by facilitating direct communication with patients and impacting physician ratings. A concern however is the increased online scrutiny and negative impact on patient satisfaction with these connections. This study aimed to investigate whether social media activity by fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeons impacts patient's perceptions and ratings on physician review websites (PRWs). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons physician directory was used to identify currently practicing shoulder and elbow surgeons in the United States. Physician ratings were collected from Healthgrades, Google reviews, and Vitals. The surgeons were divided into two groups: social media users (SMU) and non- SMU (NSMU). The association of social media use with online physician ratings was evaluated using simple and multilinear regressions. A total of 385 American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons surgeons were included and 21.3% were SMU. SMU were younger (mean age, 48 years) compared to NSMU (mean age, 51 years) (P =.01), all other demographics were comparable including sex (P =.797), medical degree (P =.114), and geographic location within the United States (P =.49). SMU had significantly higher ratings on Healthgrades (P <.001) and Vitals (P <.001). However, social media use did not impact the total number of ratings on PRWs. Additionally, surgeons who utilized Facebook had higher physician ratings and number of website reviews on Healthgrades (P =.028 and P =.014, respectively). In addition, surgeons who used Twitter had higher ratings on Healthgrades (P <.001) and Vitals (P =.001). Surgeons with a greater average number of likes per post on Twitter had significantly higher average ratings across all three sites (P =.004). Surgeons with a greater number of Twitter followers and greater average number of likes per post had significantly higher average ratings on Healthgrades (P =.052 and P =.005, respectively) while surgeons with a greater average number of likes per post had significantly higher average ratings on Vitals (P =.006). Finally, surgeons with a greater average posting frequency on Instagram had significantly higher average ratings across all websites (P =.029). Shoulder and elbow surgeons who use Twitter and Facebook had significantly higher online ratings. However, the increased use of these platforms in terms of postcontent, postfrequency, comments, and number of followers was not as influential on PRWs. This suggests that social media is an important marketing and outreach method for orthopedic surgeons to improve their ratings and patient reviews. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Supplemental Index
Externí odkaz: