Evolution of Pancreas Transplantation At A Single Institution--50+ Years and 2500 Transplants.

Autor: Finger, Erik B., Matar, Abraham J., Dunn, Ty B., Humar, Abhinav, Gruessner, Angelika C., Gruessner, Rainer W. G., Ramanathan, Karthik, Humphreville, Vanessa, Matas, Arthur J., Sutherland, David E. R., Kandaswamy, Raja
Zdroj: Annals of Surgery; Oct2024, Vol. 280 Issue 4, p604-615, 12p
Abstrakt: Objective: To describe the evolution of pancreas transplantation, including improved outcomes and factors associated with improved outcomes over the past 5 decades. Background: The world's first successful pancreas transplant was performed in December 1966 at the University of Minnesota. As new modalities for diabetes treatment mature, we must carefully assess the current state of pancreas transplantation to determine its ongoing role in patient care. Methods: A single-center retrospective review of 2500 pancreas transplants was performed over >50 years in bivariate and multivariable models. Transplants were divided into 6 eras; outcomes are presented for the entire cohort and by era. Results: All measures of patient and graft survival improved progressively through the 6 transplant eras. The overall death-censored pancreas graft half-lives were > 35 years for simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK), 7.1 years for pancreas after kidney (PAK), and 3.3 years for pancreas transplants alone (PTA). The 10-year deathcensored pancreas graft survival rate in the most recent era was 86.9% for SPK recipients, 58.2% for PAK recipients, and 47.6% for PTA. Overall, graft loss was most influenced by patient survival in SPK transplants, whereas graft loss in PAK and PTA recipients was more often due to graft failures. Predictors of improved pancreas graft survival were primary transplants, bladder drainage of exocrine secretions, younger donor age, and shorter preservation time. Conclusions: Pancreas outcomes have significantly improved over time through sequential, but overlapping, advances in surgical technique, immunosuppressive protocols, reduced preservation time, and the more recent reduction of immune-mediated graft loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Supplemental Index