COVID-19 Vaccine decision-making: trust among the transgender and disability communities in India.
| Autor: | D'souza, Sharin, Ghatole, Bhakti, Raghuram, Harikeerthan, Parakh, Sana, Tugnawat, Deepak, Shaikh, Aqsa, Singh, Satendra, Bandewar, Sunita Sheel, Bhan, Anant |
|---|---|
| Předmět: |
DISABILITIES
FEAR RESEARCH funding EXECUTIVES GENDER identity GROUP identity TRANSGENDER people VACCINATION INTERVIEWING HEALTH VACCINE effectiveness COVID-19 vaccines DECISION making JUDGMENT sampling INFORMATION resources ATTITUDE (Psychology) THEMATIC analysis VACCINATION coverage TRUST RELIGION CONCEPTUAL structures VACCINE hesitancy PSYCHOSOCIAL factors PEOPLE with disabilities COVID-19 VACCINATION status COMMUNICATION barriers |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Communication in Healthcare; Oct2024, Vol. 17 Issue 3, p265-274, 10p |
| Abstrakt: | Background: Historical marginalisation and ongoing trust deficits in health and government systems shape present-day vaccine perceptions among marginalised communities. This paper sought to understand the role of trust in decision-making about COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the transgender and disability communities in India. Methods: Using a participatory approach we interviewed 24 community representatives, identifying themselves as transgender individuals or as persons with disability, and 21 key informants such as vaccine programme managers, vaccine providers, and community advocates. We undertook an inductive thematic analysis of the data using a socio-ecological model. Results: Fear of side effects in relation to specific needs of the two communities and mistrust of systems involved in vaccination shaped four different pathways for vaccine decision-making. Mistrust of systems was influenced by past negative experiences with the health system, creating contexts in which information and misinformation are shared and interpreted. Participants negotiated their doubts about safety and mistrust of systems by interacting with different sources of influence showing patterns of decision-making that are dynamic, context-dependent, and intersectional. Conclusion: These findings will help in determining the content, strategies and approaches to equitable vaccine communication for these two communities. The two communities ought to be included in vaccine trials. Vaccine information must respond to the specific needs of these two communities which could be enabled by collaboration and engagement with community members and influencers. Finally, long-term investment towards the needs of marginalised communities is vital to dismantle cycles of marginalisation and distrust and in turn improve vaccine acceptance and uptake. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: | Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|