Pediatric Transplant Experience from a Single Center in South India.
| Autor: | Siddini, Vishwanath, Khan, Mohammed Fahad, Ravitej, S., Babu, Kishore, Ballal, H. Sudarshan |
|---|---|
| Předmět: |
KIDNEY transplantation
ORGAN donors BIOPSY PATIENTS TRANSPLANTATION of organs tissues etc. GRAFT survival ILIAC vein INFECTION control TREATMENT effectiveness HOSPITALS RETROSPECTIVE studies HEMODIALYSIS DESCRIPTIVE statistics PEDIATRICS CHRONIC kidney failure GRAFT rejection SURGICAL complications KAPLAN-Meier estimator ILIAC artery IMMUNOSUPPRESSION PATIENT aftercare PROPORTIONAL hazards models COMORBIDITY EVALUATION |
| Zdroj: | Indian Journal of Transplantation; Apr-Jun2024, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p127-131, 5p |
| Abstrakt: | Background and Objective: Pediatric renal transplantation is a life‑saving procedure for children with end‑stage renal disease. This study aims to analyze the outcomes of pediatric renal transplants at our center, focusing on patient demographics, donor sources, surgical techniques, posttransplant complications, graft survival, and rejection rates. Methodology: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 43 pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Data on recipient age, gender, donor type, pretransplant dialysis, donor characteristics, surgical techniques, native kidney disease, induction therapy, maintenance immunosuppression, posttransplant infections, graft survival, and rejection episodes were collected and analyzed. Results: We performed 43 pediatric kidney transplants in total. The average age was 13.7 years (±3.81), with 8 (18.6%) being under the age of ten, 11 (25.6%) being between the ages of eleven and fourteen, and 24 (55.8%) being between the ages of fifteen and eighteen. There were 43 recipients: 27 males and 16 females. There were four (9.3%) deceased donor renal transplants and 39 (90.7%) live‑related kidney transplants. Right internal iliac artery and right external iliac vein anastomosis were found in 32 (74.4%) cases, right external iliac artery and right external iliac vein in 9 (20.9%), right common iliac artery and right common iliac vein in 1 (2.3%), and right common iliac and right internal iliac in 1 (2.3%). Induction was used in 27 recipients (62.8%). Graft survival was seen at 1 year in 42 (97.7%) patients and at 5 years in 34 (81%). Biopsy‑proven rejection occurred in 22 (51.2%) of the recipients, with antibody‑mediated rejection occurring in 8 (18.6%) and cellular rejection occurring in 22 (51.2%). Graft loss was caused by acute cellular rejection in three (23.1%) cases, graft pyelonephritis in 2 (15.4%), and an unknown cause in 2 (15.4%). There were no significant connections with antibody‑mediated rejection. Conclusion: Our study provides valuable insights into the outcomes of pediatric renal transplantation at our center. Despite the challenges of graft rejection and posttransplant infections, favorable graft survival rates were achieved. Cellular rejection emerged as a significant risk factor for graft survival, highlighting the importance of effective immunosuppressive management. Our findings emphasize the need for close follow‑up, infection control measures, and individualized immunosuppressive strategies to optimize long‑term outcomes in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Further research is warranted to refine protocols and address the specific needs of this vulnerable patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: | Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|