| Abstrakt: |
The article discusses two separate legal cases. The first case, United States v. Daniels, involves the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversing a conviction for possession of a firearm while being an unlawful user of a controlled substance. The court ruled that historical substance use without intoxication is not sufficient to restrict gun rights. The second case, Adams v. State, involves the Supreme Court of Wyoming evaluating an appeal by Jett Garriott Adams, who alleged that his conviction for multiple charges, including attempted murder, was unfair due to expert witness testimony provided by two psychologists. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling, stating that the testimony was not prejudicial and was protected by the open-door doctrine and Wyoming statute. [Extracted from the article] |
