| Autor: |
Duro, Marlon Vincent V., Van Valkenburgh, Juno S., Abdullah, Laila, Ingles, Diana E., Cai, Zhiheng, Kerman, Bilal Ersen, Wang, Shaowei, Jacobs, Russell E., Sta. Maria, Naomi, Zanderigo, Francesca, Croteau, Etienne, Cunnane, Stephen, Rapoport, Stanley I., Chen, Kai, Yassine, Hussein N. |
| Zdroj: |
Alzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association; Dec2023 Supplement 13, Vol. 19, p1-3, 3p |
| Abstrakt: |
Background: Increased brain docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) uptake reflects a compensatory mechanism for maintaining brain DHA homeostasis and can be captured through PET‐MRI scan uptake studies using radiolabeled DHA. It has been previously shown that APOE4 status and alcohol intake alter brain DHA uptake in mice. Whether a change in DHA intake affects the brain DHA incorporation coefficient (K*) however is not known. Method: Four‐month‐old C57BL/6J mice were fed either a diet rich in DHA (15 kcal% Fat, 1.7 g/kg ALA, and 7g/kg DHA) or deficient in DHA (15 kcal% Fat and 0.9 mg/kg ALA) for 4 months. At 8 months, anesthetized mice were subjected to dynamic PET‐MRI for 30 min following i.v. injection of 22‐[18F]fluorodocosahexaenoic acid ([18F]FDHA), prepared in‐house through radiosynthesis. Using an image‐derived cardiac input function, brain uptake was assessed by estimating [18F]FDHA K* values using both the Patlak model approach and the irreversible two‐tissue compartmental model (Irr2TCM) with and without correction of the brain radioactivity for radioactive spillover from the skull. Mice were then sacrificed, and the plasma and brains were analyzed using liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry (LC‐MS) to evaluate differences in the unlabeled concentrations of fatty acids into phospholipids, triglycerides, and other lipids. Result: There was no significant difference in the [18F]FDHA K* estimates (with either Patlak or Irr2TCM) between mice fed a DHA‐rich or a DHA‐deficient diet. LC‐MS based lipidomic analysis showed that the DHA‐rich diet significantly increased DHA concentration in triglycerides in plasma and in phosphatidylethanolamine in the brain. Conclusion: These results suggest that under physiological conditions, increased dietary intake of DHA in wild‐type mice increases DHA in brain phosphatidylethanolamine and in plasma triglycerides without changing the DHA K*. The net effect likely is increased brain DHA uptake, equal to the product of unesterified DHA plasma concentration and K*. Imaging brain DHA with dynamic [18F]FDHA PET‐MRI is a potentially useful tool not only to investigate the APOE4 phenotype, which promotes DHA dysregulation, but also to assess dietary and pharmacological interventions that affect brain DHA homeostasis as well as to guide future treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
