| Autor: |
Elshewi, Islam Elhefnawi, Fatouh, Mona Mohammed, Mohamed, Rahma Nour Eldin Saad, Basheer, Mye Ali, El Liethy, Nevien Ezzat, Abbas, Hoda Magdy |
| Zdroj: |
Journal of Ultrasound; Jun2023, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p409-421, 13p |
| Abstrakt: |
Aim of work: The type of traumatic peripheral nerve injury is a key factor for determining optimal treatment. Proper assessment of peripheral nerve injury facilitates appropriate treatment, significantly affects prognosis, and reduces disabilities. This study evaluated ultrasonography (US) to assess upper limb traumatic nerve injuries and compared the US with electrodiagnostic studies as the gold standard. Materials and Methods: Participants were 69 adults (57 [83%] men, 12 [17%] women; mean age 36.3 ± 13.5 years) with a total of 96 peripheral nerve injuries (duration of 1 month–3 years). High-frequency US examinations and electro-physiologic studies confirmed upper limb peripheral nerve injury. Results: Nerve discontinuation was diagnosed in 15 (15.6%) nerves; the cross-sectional area was increased in 33 (34.4%) nerves. Of 96 injuries, 54 (56.3%) were median, 24 (25%) were ulnar, and 18 (18.8%) were radial nerves. No statistically significant difference was found between US and electro-physiologic studies for nerve injury diagnosis (p = 0.054). Conclusion: No significant differences were found between US and electro-physiologic studies for diagnosis of nerve injuries; however, US was valuable to assess surrounding tissue and supplied muscles. The capabilities to detect nerve injury and associated distal muscular, vascular, and other regional structures position the US as a complementary diagnostic tool. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink