| Abstrakt: |
Moreover, productivity and verb acceptability, when evaluated, also supported the proposed flexibility of ear verbs, showing many verb-types associations are possible and that comprehenders take quite seriously the interpretive demands imposed by the frame (as originally claimed by [50] I a.m.o. i ). (1) HT ht Kiparsky, in turn, points out that a syntactically driven approach to meaning composition in denominal verbs such as HK's, although successful in several respects, cannot explain a series of issues concerning verb interpretation and productivity gaps. In particular, new (or not-often-discussed) verb classes appear, extending the range of possible verb types for ear, along with the spread of possible (verb-class) interpretations. Keywords: verb; derivation; denominal; lexicon; syntax; verbalizer EN verb derivation denominal lexicon syntax verbalizer 291 334 44 09/06/22 20220901 NES 220901 1 Introduction: Why These Verbs and Why New Evidence? Importantly, one thing that is constant in the verbs in (56) is that the root generally designates an instrument used or involved in accomplishing the action described by the verb ("Verbs of Instrument of Communication", [37]; [28], I a.m.o. i ) (57). [Extracted from the article] |
