| Abstrakt: |
We evaluated the recent replacements of Salix fragilis L. with S. еuxina I.V.Belyaeva, and S. ×rubens Schrank with S. ×fragilis L. (S. alba L. × S. euxina). The specimens of S. еuxina, identified by Belyaeva, were analyzed. The morphological characters did not coincide with those in the species description, and the ovule number was different in all specimens. This makes the application of the name S. еuxina impossible and precludes the possibility of replacing S. fragilis for S. euxina. Also, the original Linnaean descriptions of S. fragilis, the related S. alba, and S. pentandra, as well as Linnaeus's herbarium specimens, were examined. Each of the three protologues describes the characteristics of the pure species as well as their hybrids: S. pentandra × S. fragilis (in the protologues of S. pentandra and S. fragilis) and S. alba × S. fragilis (in the protologue of S. alba). Our study of the morphology, geographic data, and ovule number demonstrates that the recent replacements of S. fragilis with S. еuxina, and S. ×rubens with S. ×fragilis (S. alba × S. euxina) were erroneous. We propose continuing to use S. fragilis as the name for a glabrous crack willow and S. ×rubens for its hybrid with S. alba. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Plný text